翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Wir, Masovian Voivodeship
・ Wir-Kolonia
・ WIRA
・ Wira Apachita
・ Wira Challwa
・ Wira Gardiner
・ Wira Wira
・ Wirada
・ Wiradech Kothny
・ Wipeout (1999 Australian game show)
・ Wipeout (2008 U.S. game show)
・ Wipeout (2009 Australian game show)
・ Wipeout (album)
・ Wipeout (comics)
・ Wipeout (Dreamworld)
Wipeout (elections)
・ Wipeout (ride)
・ Wipeout (roller coaster)
・ Wipeout (season 1)
・ Wipeout (season 2)
・ Wipeout (season 3)
・ Wipeout (season 4)
・ Wipeout (season 5)
・ Wipeout (season 6)
・ Wipeout (season 7)
・ Wipeout (series)
・ Wipeout (UK game show)
・ Wipeout (video game)
・ Wipeout 2048
・ Wipeout 2097


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Wipeout (elections) : ウィキペディア英語版
Wipeout (elections)

An electoral wipeout occurs when a major party receives far fewer votes or seats in a Legislature than their position justifies. It is the opposite of a landslide victory; the two frequently going hand in hand.
Note that the use of the phrase generally assumes that the returns were the product of a legitimate election; show elections to fraudulent legislatures regularly produce incredibly strong majorities for the ruling party(s).
== Australia ==
Between 1901 and 1949, the upper house of the Australian Senate was elected by a system of majoritarian or "winner-take-all" voting. Each state had 3 of its 6 Senators retiring at each half-senate election. Each voter had 3 votes at each election, whether by first-past-the-post (FPTP) 1901-1918, or the alternative vote. It was often the case that the 3 seats all went the same way, leading to lopsided results in the six states such as 36-0 or 3-33. These results brought the parliament into some disrepute.
In 1948, the Single Transferable Vote (STV) was introduced. At the same time, the number of senators per state was increased from 6 to 10, with 5 instead of 3 retiring at each triennial election. The increased number of vacancies per election would have exacerbated the "landslide/wipeout" effect if the old winner-take-all system had been retained. Instead, having more seats ''increased'' the degree of proportionality between votes received and seats won by parties.
Since the introduction of STV in the Senate, the parties have generally been evenly balanced, with minor parties and independents holding the balance of power. While frustrated, the government in the lower house has had a lot of different people to negotiate with.
In the 2004 election, the government did the nearly impossible and gained the 57% of the vote in one state to obtain a majority in its own right in the senate from July 2005, when the new senators take up their seats. The number of quotas required to win a majority (four) of six seats, at 57% (four-sevenths of the votes), is so high because there are an even number of seats.
In the lower house, FPTP was changed to preferential voting in 1918.
In the 1974 Queensland state election, using single-member electorates and full-preferential voting, the Labor opposition was reduced to a "cricket team" of eleven MPs, against the National Country Party/ Liberal Party Coalition government with 69 seats (and 2 Independents).

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Wipeout (elections)」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.